Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 01:02
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Have you ever been spanked in front of a group of people?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What to know about nerve pain and tingling hands and feet - The Washington Post
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
How one of San Francisco's most successful new chains 'just kind of happened' - SFGATE
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
I am a copy and paste developer, how do I become a real software developer?
Let’s just make it real clear:
What’s next?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump administration’s deep cuts to public health leave system reeling - PBS